Comparison

Four ways to get a price in front of a client. One takes 30 seconds.

Most small businesses email a PDF or retype a Word template. Proposal platforms fix that and charge per person per month for it. This is the honest version of the tradeoff, including the jobs we are the wrong tool for.

  • Under 30 seconds to a client-ready link
  • Free to send, and no account to start
  • Accepted with a typed name and a timestamp

Side by side

What actually differs

Every row is something a client feels or a number you can check. The rows we lose are written the same way as the rows we win.

The questionSendProposalsFastFree · $12/mo ProProposal platformPer user, per monthPDF by emailFreeWord or DocsFree
Time to send your first oneFrom opening the page to a link in the client's hand.Under 30 secondsAn account, a card, and a setup sessionAbout as long as the document takesAbout as long as the document takes
Account needed to sendNoYes, plus a card on mostAn email accountYes
What the client doesThe step where deals go quiet.Opens a link, taps acceptOpens a link, taps acceptDownloads, zooms, repliesAsks for access, replies
Readable on a phoneBoth sidesClient side, usuallyPinch to zoomPoor
Recorded acceptanceA typed name and a timestamp, not a reply saying it looks good.Yes, every tierYesNoNo
You know when it was readPro, $12/moYes, on most tiersNoNo
Deposit collected on the pageThrough your own payment processor. The money never touches us.Pro, $12/moYes, on higher tiersNoNo
Fixed once acceptedNeither side can quietly change the price afterwards.YesYesThe file can be editedThe doc can be edited
Template library and a client listA row we lose.13 industry templates, no CRMFull library and a CRMYour own folderYour own folder
Team workflows and approvalsA row we lose.None, this is a tool for one personYes, that is what the price buysNoComment threads
What 20 proposals a month costsTwenty you wrote yourself.$0 free, or $12 on ProPer seat, and metered on entry tiers$0, plus your time$0, plus your time

The proposal platform column is the shape of the category rather than any one product. For a named comparison with figures and their sources, open one of the pages below.

The real cost

The free option is the one with a price on it.

Do the arithmetic with your own numbers. If retyping a template takes you 40 minutes and you send 20 proposals a month, that is 13 hours of your own time, every month, to send the document you sent last week. Ours takes about 30 seconds each, which is under 10 minutes for the same 20.

Those are your numbers, not measurements of ours. The 40 minutes is the assumption, and it is the one worth checking against your own last invoice.

Retyping a template

13 hrs

per month, 20 proposals

This

10 min

per month, 20 proposals

Honest limits

When to buy something else

Four cases where a proposal platform is the better purchase. If one of these is you, the rest of this page is not worth your time.

You need a legally binding signature

A client accepts by typing their name, which we record with a timestamp and the exact line items they agreed to. That is a strong record of intent, and it is not an e-signature with a certificate and an audit trail. If a contract needs that, buy a tool that does it.

More than one person sends proposals

There are no seats, no roles and no shared library, because there is no team model at all. That is why the price does not multiply, and it is also why a sales team of four should buy a proposal platform instead.

The proposal is a 20-page pitch

This is built for a scope, some priced line items and terms, on one screen. A long RFP response with case studies and appendices belongs in a document, not in a link.

You want the proposal in your CRM

We have no integrations and no API. The proposal lives here and the link goes wherever you send it. If it has to appear against a deal record automatically, we cannot do that.

One by one

Compared with the tools people ask about

Each page names what the other tool does better before it says a word about what we do, and every figure carries the page it was read on and the day it was read.

Comparison

SendProposalsFast vs PandaDoc

PandaDoc is a document platform for sales teams. It handles proposals, contracts, NDAs and order forms, with a content library, a CRM connection and approval routing behind them. We do one of those things, for one person, in about half a minute.

Comparison

SendProposalsFast vs Proposify

Proposify is the proposal tool agencies benchmark against: a deep template library, section-level analytics showing how long a client spent on your pricing page, approval workflows and CRM integration. It is a well-built product for a sales team that sends proposals for a living.

Comparison

SendProposalsFast vs Better Proposals

Better Proposals is proposal software built for freelancers and small businesses who want a proposal that looks designed without hiring a designer. Good templates, a genuine focus on simplicity, and a price that respects a small business. Of everything in this category it is the closest to what we are trying to do.

Comparison

SendProposalsFast vs Qwilr

Qwilr turns a proposal into an interactive web page rather than a document: embedded video, live pricing tables a client can configure, ROI calculators, and analytics behind all of it. For a sales team selling something complicated, it is a genuinely different and better artifact than a PDF.

Comparison

SendProposalsFast vs HoneyBook

HoneyBook is a client management platform for independent businesses: enquiry forms, a scheduler, proposals, contracts, invoices, payments, automations and a client portal in one place. Proposals are one feature of a dozen, and for the right business that bundle is genuinely good value.

Check the 30 seconds yourself

SendProposalsFast is proposal software for freelancers and small service businesses. Fill in four fields on the home page and time it. Nothing to cancel afterwards, because there was nothing to sign up for.